Consultation Hub

From 13 April to 31 May 2021, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on Scotland’s modern garden and designed landscape heritage. We asked for nominations of sites to include in our new programme of work, ‘Designed Landscapes of the Recent Past’.  

Background 

We think gardens and designed landscapes dating from 1945 to the early 2000s are currently underrepresented in our publicly available records. These include the online database for the National Record of the Historic Environment (Canmore) and the Inventory of Gardens and Designed Landscapes. 

This programme will champion Scotland’s modern garden and designed landscape heritage through recording sites, improving online records and considering the most important sites for designation.  

We aim to develop our understanding of modern gardens and designed landscapes – including their survival and significance – and to promote knowledge about this important part of our historic environment.  

We had 30 responses to the survey. Most were from private individuals, but we also received responses on behalf of organisations, public bodies or charities and from private businesses. 

All respondents agreed that gardens and designed landscapes of the recent past were part of Scotland’s historic environment and that they should be protected in the same way as older sites. Most respondents considered that modern designed landscapes were not adequately represented in our online records and were sometimes under threat.  

Comments noted that sites of this period were not always valued as much as buildings or natural landscapes and could be vulnerable to loss, alteration or problems with maintenance.  

Other comments noted that these sites were part of Scotland’s story and that recording them and telling their history was important for future generations. Several respondents told us that we should consider landscape broadly, and to include sites related to housing, industry and infrastructure in our programme. 

Respondents were able to nominate up to 3 sites for us to consider as part of the programme. 

We received a total of 47 nominations. Once repeat nominations are subtracted, this gives us a total of 42 different sites from a total of 15 local authority areas across Scotland. The local authority areas with the largest numbers of nominations were Glasgow City Council and Edinburgh City Council. 

Since the close of the online survey on 31st May, we have begun research on the nominated sites. We will consider these sites alongside those brought to our attention through internal conversations in HES, a stakeholder webinar in April 2021, and through the ScoMo project (https://scomolandscape.wordpress.com/portfolio/).  

After reading the comments and nominations from the survey, we have decided to publish a more detailed report on the results of the survey (estimated by late summer 2021). Please check back on this page for updates. 

Next steps 

• Select a small number of nominated sites for recording in 2021-2022 

• Plan a sequence of phases of work from 2022 onwards 

• Publish more information about this project on our website www.historicenvironment.scot/gardens-and-designed-landscapes 

We would welcome any further feedback or nominations that you might have. 

You can contact the project team on modernlandscapes@hes.scot.  

From 22 September to 15 December 2020, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on new draft guidance ‘Talking About Heritage’.

Background

This document is part of an ongoing review of historic environment policy guidance, following on from the What's Your Heritage? campaign and the launch of the Historic Environment Policy for Scotland (HEPS) in May 2019.

What's Your Heritage? asked people from all over the country how Scotland’s places, buildings and monuments should be recognised and celebrated. Feedback from over 2,000 responses to the campaign told us that people wanted to achieve recognition for the heritage that matters to them.

Talking About Heritage is part of the HES response to this.

What is the guidance about?

Talking About Heritage is intended to be used as a tool by anyone with an interest in exploring and talking about heritage. The guidance aims to equip people to have new – sometimes difficult – conversations about our places, people and traditions.

We wanted to find out if the Talking About Heritage guidance would help you to investigate, to share and celebrate, and to achieve recognition for the heritage that matters to you.

We had 34 replies to the survey as well as written feedback which we received from a range of interested individuals, organisations, public bodies, charities and local authorities.

The draft Talking About Heritage guidance was generally well received. It was felt to be a useful and comprehensive resource. Comments included suggestions about what additional content could be included, improved signposting, accessibility - particularly around language and aims - and the need for the final product to be easy to navigate and use.

We were told that we should:

• ensure simple and clear language throughout
• be clearer about the purpose of the guidance
• be clearer who the guidance is for and manage expectations of what it will help to achieve
• publish the guidance as an interactive web-based resource
• make sure the guidance is accessible for deaf users
• keep the content and the links up to date

After considering the all of the comments and suggestions received, we have updated the guidance with:

• clear and simple language
• clearer information about who the guidance is for and how it might be used
• increased signposting and more information about other relevant organisations and resources

Based on your feedback, we have also:

• explored how best to publish Talking About Heritage as an online and interactive resource
• looked at how we can produce the guidance with British Sign Language (BSL) content
• agreed a regular review period to keep the guidance up to date

Next steps:

We are currently working on updating the draft guidance and incorporating your feedback. The final guidance, an online resource, is planned for publication this summer.

During October and November 2020, we hosted a public consultation to test and trial our existing outcomes in terms of ambition and relevance.

Our purpose in carrying out the survey was to test people's views on our existing outcomes as well as provide feedback on what equality focus our work should take for the next four years.

To support the survey, collaborative discussions were held with external agencies, such as Forth Valley Sensory Centre and Young Scot, as well as internal sessions with our Youth Forum and LGBT+ employee network.

We received 58 responses with 51 responding as individuals.

Organisations who responded included: Deaf Scotland; Hidaya; Heritage Trust Network; Empower Women for Change, National Trust for Scotland; and Stonewall.

There was positive feedback on Historic Environment Scotland (HES) activities to date. Most respondents:

• agreed that the activities highlighted in the survey did make a difference to the lives of people with protected characteristics.
• were satisfied with the number of activities HES was engaged in although the levels of satisfaction were lowest in activities on race and D/deaf.
• agreed that HES was delivering a broad range of activities showing broad support as well as room for improvement.

Recurring themes in the responses received related to:

• concerns over the growth in hate crime in wider society
• comments on how the pandemic is disproportionally impacting people with protected characteristics including their socio-economic status and access to services
• encouragement for HES to keep working with others, learning, and improving
• a lot of interest in our staff networks and external partnerships and call for more information and updates
• desire for HES to lead in sectoral change, seeking out, initiating and pursuing debate
• desire for HES to set equality recruitment and training targets and work towards them.

In analysing the responses, three categories emerged in thinking about equalities and HES:

• Our Society
• Our services
• Our people.

Using these three categories we extracted the following key learnings:

Our Society:

Emphasis on ensuring that equality is integral to understanding our contribution to Scotland’s economic, social, environmental, and cultural wellbeing.

Identification of a need and expectation that HES lead sectoral change.

Recognition of the value of collaboration and partnership with communities and other organisations, including academic partnership for research and evidence base.

Our Services: 

Focus on access, diversity, and inclusion. 

The impact of COVID–19 restrictions on access has been raised as a significant concern and calls to maintain and improve access as we enter the recovery phase and reimagine our work following the pandemic.

The need to draw out untold or hidden histories considered as important issues to be addressed, specifically building on our successful initiatives, and sharing learning wider across HES and the sector. 

Our People:

Our Board, employees and volunteers are committed to do and learn more about how their role can support our equality practice.

The consultation highlighted calls to improve the diversity of our workforce by, for example, setting recruitment targets, targeting the recruitment of interns and apprenticeships, and harnessing the interest and influence of our people through our employee networks. It also highlighted the importance of diversity in our leadership team and Board.

There were calls for more visible and clearer internal leadership on equality issues with some comments still resonating with concerns raised in response to the Black Lives Matter movement. It is important to embed equality within our decision making, planning, and resourcing processes. HES should lead sectoral change and empower and enable our employees in this.

These responses have helped to shape the HES Equalities Outcomes 2021-25 which is available on our website:

• Mainstreaming and 2021-25 Equality Outcomes Report
• Easy Read version
• Equality Monitoring Data Report 2019 and 2020